On Prime Models in Totally Categorical Abstract Elementary Classes
نویسنده
چکیده
We show: Theorem 0.1. Let K be a fully LS(K)-tame and short abstract elementary class (AEC) with amalgamation. Write H1 := i(2LS(K))+ and assume that K is categorical in some λ ≥ H1. The following are equivalent: (1) K≥H1 has primes over sets of the form M ∪ {a}. (2) K is categorical in all λ′ ≥ H1. Note that (1) implies (2) appears in an earlier paper. Here we prove (2) implies (1), generalizing an argument of Shelah who proved the existence of primes at successor cardinals. Assuming a large cardinal axiom, we deduce an equivalence between Shelah’s eventual categoricity conjecture and the statement that every AEC categorical in a proper class of cardinals eventually has prime models over sets of the form M ∪ {a}. Corollary 0.2. Assume there exists a proper class of almost strongly compact cardinals. Let K be an AEC categorical in a proper class of cardinals. The following are equivalent: (1) There exists λ0 such that K≥λ0 has primes over sets of the form M ∪ {a}. (2) There exists λ1 such that K is categorical in all λ ≥ λ1.
منابع مشابه
Building prime models in fully good abstract elementary classes
We show how to build primes models in classes of saturated models of abstract elementary classes (AECs) having a well-behaved independence relation: Theorem 0.1. Let K be an almost fully good AEC that is categorical in LS(K) and has the LS(K)-existence property for domination triples. For any λ > LS(K), the class of Galois saturated models of K of size λ has prime models over every set of the f...
متن کاملCategoricity from One Successor Cardinal in Tame Abstract Elementary Classes
We prove that from categoricity in λ we can get categoricity in all cardinals ≥ λ in a χ-tame abstract elementary classe K which has arbitrarily large models and satisfies the amalgamation and joint embedding properties, provided λ > LS(K) and λ ≥ χ. For the missing case when λ = LS(K), we prove that K is totally categorical provided that K is categorical in LS(K) and LS(K).
متن کاملUncountable categoricity of local abstract elementary classes with amalgamation
We give a complete and elementary proof of the following upward categoricity theorem: LetK be a local abstract elementary class with amalgamation and joint embedding, arbitrarily large models, and countable LöwenheimSkolem number. If K is categorical in א1 then K is categorical in every uncountable cardinal. In particular, this provides a new proof of the upward part of Morley’s theorem in firs...
متن کاملShelah's categoricity conjecture from a successor for tame abstract elementary classes
We prove a categoricity transfer theorem for tame abstract elementary classes. Theorem 0.1. Suppose that K is a χ-tame abstract elementary class and satisfies the amalgamation and joint embedding properties and has arbitrarily large models. Let λ ≥ Max{χ,LS(K)}. If K is categorical in λ and λ, then K is categorical in λ. Combining this theorem with some results from [Sh 394], we derive a form o...
متن کاملShelah's eventual categoricity conjecture in universal classes: Part I
We prove: Theorem 0.1. Let K be a universal class. If K is categorical in cardinals of arbitrarily high cofinality, then K is categorical on a tail of cardinals. The proof stems from ideas of Adi Jarden and Will Boney, and also relies on a deep result of Shelah. As opposed to previous works, the argument is in ZFC and does not use the assumption of categoricity in a successor cardinal. The argu...
متن کامل